Search for: "Sprint Spectrum L.P." Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
Sprint Spectrum L.P., ___ Cal.4th ___, 2009 WL 197560 (Jan. 29, 2009). [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:00 pm
Sprint Spectrum L.P., 150 Cal.App.4th 1136 (2007) (review granted). [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 3:00 pm
Sprint Spectrum L.P. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1136, in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal held that Proposition 64 created a two-part, standing test, and applied that test to bar claims by plaintiffs who were unable to show that the defendant had attempted to enforce the unlawful and unconscionable provisions in their agreements. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:08 am
Sprint Nextel Corp., Sprint Spectrum, L.P., & Sprint Solutions, Inc., Case No. 1:07-cv-0640 (N.D. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 2:00 pm
Sprint Spectrum L.P. (2007) 150 Cal.App.4th 1136 (Supreme Court No. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:16 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The CAFC determined that PTAB erred in claim construction:Sprint Spectrum L.P. appeals the final written decisionof the Patent Trial and Appeal Board declining to hold certain claims of U.S. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 4:26 am
Sprint Spectrum L.P. held that a plaintiff has no standing to sue under the CLRA without some allegation that allegedly unlawful practice resulted in some kind of tangible increased cost or burden to plaintiff, even if the plaintiff seeks only injunctive relief to prevent an unlawful practice. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:22 am by Gregory B. Williams
Sprint Spectrum L.P., et al., Civil Action No. 14-612-RGA (D.Del., September 2, 2015) (consolidated), the Court granted Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings of invalidity after applying the two-step framework provided in Alice Corp. [read post]
10 May 2019, 8:53 am by Dennis Crouch
  Sprint Spectrum L.P., dba Sprint PCS, SCT Docket No. 18-1397 (Supreme Court 2019) The Supreme Court has received a new eligibility challenge from Prism Tech — although this one is in the form of a civil procedure question: Whether the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals may retroactively expand the scope of its appellate jurisdiction to invalidate patent claims under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:10 am
., HTC Corporation, AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., Kyocera Corporation, Boost Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Inc. and ZTE (USA), Inc. filed a motion to stay pending resolution of an inter partes review before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("PTAB"). [read post]